 | | |
| Disclaimer:
The views expressed on this chat board do not necessarily reflect those of the site provider.
All information that is disclosed in this forum becomes public information and you should exercise caution when deciding to share any of your personal information.
Any message which is deemed inappropriate may be modified or removed by the site administrator. |
the real zac Sunday, October 11, 2009 3:47:48 PM
Strange, someone using my name to try and start confrontation. Amazing what one can come back to after not visiting a site for a couple months. |
Zac Thursday, October 01, 2009 5:21:01 PM
Nishy poo i do not care what u think nor say.. and sorry but i do not want to meet or contact u in any way. fairwell. |
luc Friday, July 17, 2009 5:32:32 PM
Cheifs, vote Beaucage or we won''t vote for you. |
stan the man Thursday, July 16, 2009 5:32:41 PM
No answer. I guess you don''t like your opponents. LOL |
Thunderbird Thursday, July 16, 2009 3:14:05 PM
I understand that the Assembly of Quebec Labrador First Nations Chiefs are working with the BC Chiefs to support their candidate. I would advise that you lobby the AQLFN Chiefs to support John for in my opinion, he is the right candidate to lead us out of our economic crisis. |
non-FN observer Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:51:37 PM
I''ve had the chance to work with Chief Beaucage on housing issues nationally for a few years, and have ben very impressed. I am hopeful of his victory on the weekend. |
stan the man Monday, July 06, 2009 9:00:02 AM
the election is soon. I''m getting excited. Must be election fever. One good thing is that there hasn''t been any political mudslinging, you know, where candidates talk trash about each other without actually talking about the issues. Candidate Beaucage, what is the top quality or policy idea that you like in each of your opponents? What would you emulate? What do you respect about them? Briefly, please. |
Frederick Loft----Mohawk,Six nations Sunday, July 05, 2009 8:06:11 AM
if we recognize First Nations governments should we not have a first nation political party?How else are we going to have a say in how the governments of the day deal with our issues ie treaty rights,education,poverty,land claims,water,mining,logging,equality,unionization,north american recognition,a new First Nations actindian act,racism,discrimination,employment equity,so -called funding and the many other issues that are presently controlled by the powers in office and the parties that we rely on to act on our behalf?If we are a part of the government then we have a say if not then we have no right to bitch and complain when nothing gets done >In dealing separately with the governments we allow the governments to divide and conquer and maintain the status quo.A First Nations M.P from each province would certainly provide a voice and some leadership in regards to our issues as Elijah Harper once did .Let''s be realistic without voice and VOTE our voices fall on deaf ears .Your views are requested.I have questioned Chief Belleguard on this issue with no response as of this date Nya Weh |
Mimi Makwa Friday, June 26, 2009 7:22:37 PM
OK thanks, but lets say Ojibway, Odawa and Pottawatomi, didn''''t they consider themselves one nation, maybe a multicultural nation, but still one nation? Saulteaux, weren''''t they Anishinabe but got stuck on a collective identity given to them by the French? Do you see where I''''m going with this? Pre-contact nations. I''''m not trying to seperate the various tribes or other sub groups of the nations, but the actual united nations. Dakota, Lakota, Nakota, weren''''t they the same nation but sub groups of one nation? My worry is that the many many distinct cultures and nations were actually fewer but larger nations then we are led to believe. You mentioned anthropologists, aren''''t they agents of colonialism with a divide and conquer agenda. Post-contact, various groups did unite for various reasons, but the treaties divided them again. My hope for the future is greater unity, tribes of the nations reunited and not seeking seperate nation status. Take for example the 12 tribes of Israel, 12 tribes but one nation. I hope I''''m making some sense. |
Eric J. Large Thursday, June 25, 2009 11:47:46 AM
What''s John Beaucage''s position on the McIvor v. The Registrar, Indian and Northern Affairs, Canada case? Is it pro-McIvor or pro-First Nations'' right to determine citizenship? |
Eyaabay Tuesday, June 23, 2009 11:08:12 AM
Mimi Makwa: Here is a list of 53 that my team compiled. I''m sure we have missed a few and there may be others that need to be clarified.
I don''t want to sound like an anthropologist, but most of these Nations have distinct people, cultures and language variants. However, there are several that are closely related but still consider themselves quite distinct.
In this list, we tried to use their traditional Indigenous names. Many have more common names that their Nation is known by.
In my vision of a Nationhood model for the AFN, the assembly could be made up of proportionate designated representatives from each of our true Nations, rather than a system based solely on the Indian Act.
I trust that this is helpful.
-------------------------------------
Innu
Mi''kmaq
Maliseet
Attikamek-Montagnais
Abenaki
Wendat
Mushkegowuk Cree
Mohawk
Caguga
Onondoga
Oneida
Seneca
Tucarora
Ojibway
Odawa
Pottawatomi
Mississauga
Algonquin
Chippewa
Lena Lenape
Plains Cree
Saulteaux
Dakota
Lakota
Nakota
Dene
Haida
Ktunaxa
Tsimshian
Gitxsan
Nisga''a
Haisla
Heiltsuk
Oweekeno
Kwakwaka''wakw
Nuu-chah-nulth
Tsilhqot''in
Dakelh
Wet''suwet''en
Sekani
Dunne-za
Dene-thah
Tahltan
Kaska
Tagish
Tutchone
Nuxalk
Coast Salish
Stl''atl''imc
Nlaka''pamux
Okanagan
Secwepemc
Tlingit |
Mimi Makwa Monday, June 22, 2009 6:07:01 PM
Eyaabay, ultimately it will be the people of the nations to decide their collective identities, but I was wondering if you could help with this list of pre-contact nations.
Siksika, Dene, Athabaskan, Anishinabe, Inninew, Haudenosaunee, Haida. That''s all I can think of. What other nations, to the best of your knowledge, were there a few hundred years ago in the area now known as Canada.
Personal reply not necessary, one of your aides can respond. |
charles Monday, June 22, 2009 2:53:15 PM
Never forget that the treaties are sacred documents. We must respect the treaties to ensure that future generation can continue to enjoy the benefits of treaties as we have for the past seven generations. |
Eyaabay Friday, June 19, 2009 9:24:45 AM
To Carol Wildcat:
I am not affiliated with any political party and have never had a membership with any party.
Right now, Conservative Canada sees us an impediment for natural and logical in their mind development of Canada for economic gain by government and business. Unfortunately, they feel we get in the way with our talk of rights, of lands, and of Treaties. It is perceived that we have always been in the way - which is why the Indian Act was enacted to subjugate and assimilate us.
Many of our people and communities across Canada live in extreme poverty and deprivation. However, many in corporate Canada and government see us a drain, a negative part of the formula to calculate the Gross Domestic Product of this country.
I see it as the rest of Canada benefiting from their Treaty relationship with us. We agreed to share the benefits of this great land and our natural and rightful share did not come back to us. This way of doing things for the past 150 years must end and must not be repeated for the next 100 years. We must share in the wealth of all the resources taken from our territories, in doing so we can negotiate another fiscal relationship with Canada, one that is more respectful to our governments and our place within the socio-economic fabric of Canada.
No longer should we have to tell young people that there are no resources available for them to go to Post Secondary school, no longer should we have to tell an Elder that the drug they need to keep them healthy is not on the drug formulary. These things should just not happen. But they do because Canada believes they only have a moral responsibility for us. The relationship is much more complicated and really gets to the contractual relationship of Treaty the most paramount contract there is. There is an absolute contract to have us have an equitable share of the wealth of Canada. From this starting point we can educate our youth, start businesses, create partnerships and enjoy a wealthy and prosperous future.
Please bear in mind that this is not an over night process, it will take time, we have been addicted to dependency for over 100 years. |
CC Friday, June 19, 2009 8:56:12 AM
Dear John Beaucage, I wish my community would release an annual community report that lists all revenues, overviews of expenses, salaries by position, a list of all consultants and contractors retained by the community, and brief reports on the activities of all departments. It seems like such an easy thing to do but Cheif and council always say they are too busy or it just not possible. I have a feeling that they are just scared to be accountable becuase there would be a riot if everybody knew where the money was going. I just wanted you to hear one voice from the people on the kind of accountability we want. |
Rodney Nelson Thursday, June 18, 2009 3:03:55 PM
I wanted to support John Beaucage Eyaabay on his bid for National Chief. I have had the pleasure of working with John on his economic development blue ribbon think tank and know him to be a person of integrity and honesty. He has the experience, knowledge and leadership to take our communities into the future and recognize the visions of many nations. Recently I asked John on short notice to come and speak to students at Carleton University on the future of our nations. He agreed and showed that he is more than just politics, he respects the youth and is willing to listen. He has a strong vision and strength that will take us all into a new future. I hope to be a part of it. There is an old Sioux saying - His words shoot straight from the heart. Eyaabay''s words are straight from the heart. |
Nishy Poo Wednesday, June 17, 2009 11:48:57 AM
Hey Zac, sorry if I conveyed a sense of mockery. It is essential at this point in time to give the appearance that the nationalist movement I am a part of poses no real threat the established order. I truly value your contribution to this forum, more so than any other posts I''ve seen here. I do mean what I saw about our descendent being born in a proud free sovereign nation, and I do mean what I said about us serving the nation as opposed to the nation serving us. Again, my intent was not to mock. It is an almost impossible task to positively affect the hearts and minds of the people. The constant failures and challenges would destroy the movement if we were to take ourselves to seriously. Playing the fool help to maintain some semblance of sanity in fulfilling an insane mission. I appreciate the fact that you were able to maintain a sense of humor. Truly, you are the type of person we are looking for. Nishy Poo hopes that someday Zac and Nishy Poo will meet in person so that we can plan a the establishment of an organization that truly represents the people, and ultimately, to plan a revolution. Take care and please stay vocal. |
Zac Wednesday, June 17, 2009 10:15:58 AM
haha, thanks for the response nishy poo.
Militant doesn''t necessarily mean violent, nor does it mean that it has to be merely symbolic. What I meant by militancy was a willingness, on the part of a supposed leadership, to accurately reflect peoples desire for liberation from poverty, from alienation, from white tutelage, etc and to mobilize people, elevate peoples political consciousness, and take action that create ''facts'' on the ground instead of simply negotiating, in fact begging for land, resources, to be given back. It means a willingness to act and mobilize, not just talk, is what I meant by militancy. As for your speculation as to what would occur in the event of nations being reconstituted or decolonized, it is just that, speculation, and as such, of little need for me to respond. As anyone familiar with the case of Quebec knows, sovereignty doesn''t necessarily entail complete separation or arbitrary withdrawal from all relations with the rest of the country but merely a renegotiation as to the essential features of the relationship, a devolution of responsibility and areas of jurisdiction, among other things. So I do appreciate your response and your attempt at humor, but your seeming inability to actually respond to the question in preference for mockery betrays more an ignorance on your part as to the possibilities for other forms of development. So the jokes on you Nishy Poo. |
Nishy Poo Monday, June 15, 2009 5:54:38 PM
hey Zac, i know of a handful of Nish nationalists who have something like what you describe sans militancy. there is militant rhetoric, but it is merely symbolic. Non-violent revolution is the name of the game. What nation are you descended from Zac? The right ancestry could score you front row seats to the revolution. As for your question, if you choose, you could be a citizen of the sovereign nation, but you''d be working in Canada on a visa. The nation would do nothing for you except gaurantee the birth of your descendents in a proud free Indigenous nation. The nation should not serve us, we should serve the nation. If the people want their nation to serve them, go back to the Indian reserve to suckle her Majesty''s teat. Not sure if that really answers any question, but Nishy Poo don''t care. Nishy Poo only cares for Nishy Poo''s nation...Oh wait, can answer your Q, down with AFN and any other org that strenghtens Her Majesty''s elitist and corrupt Indian Chiefs. Long live the true Anishinabe nation. |
Mike Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:09:06 PM
Hello, sorry if you''ve already stated your plan of action on
these few items but I''ve just started today to read through
all candidates platforms ...
a. what would you do with attawapiskat''s struggle to get a
new school? who''s fiduciary responsibility does their
situation belong to and what would be your approach in the
media to positively influence the non-native opinion
voters?
b. for the majority of our first nations communities there is
a housing crisis on-reserve - considering that there always
has been a crisis and most likely always will be a crisis -
what is your gameplan to ensure that we no longer live two
or three families per house, sleeping in shifts, with mould
in the most cheapest made houses, etc. etc.
c. how do you intend to make the canadian federal
government responsible to its residents on federal indian
reserves?
d. most of our people live off-reserve, the business lives of
our politicians are mostly conducted off-reserve - how will
you overcome the canadian federal government''s policies
and bureaucratic mess to truly represent first nation people
residing in canada?
e. what is your opinion of the office of the minister of
indian affairs in general? and specifically what this minister
is proposing with our post-secondary education funding?
f. what is your opinion on all the recent activity in BC
where those first nations are signing treaties or have
entered into self-government? is there any value in those
treaties that the other first nations across canada can learn
from when planning for current and future well-being of their
own communities?
h. what do you think of your fellow candidates?
thanks. |
Zac Sunday, June 07, 2009 7:57:04 PM
A quick question, be interested to know peoples thoughts.
Since the struggle we have set out for ourselves is one designed to attain a measure of self-determination, where does that leave the rest of us in the cities, and those without status?
Obviously indigenous control over the institutions governing indigenous communities makes sense, and is certainly worth struggling for. But in the struggle to reconstitute our nations it seems that many of us, some say half, are largely excluded from this process.
I often feel as if we have no representation, or no quality representation. I, for one, don''t recognize CAP or that uncle tom Patrick Brazeau as a representative. And it seems as if the AFN is hardly a motor for the type of decolonization struggle that would be worthy of the name. It''s government funded, and as such, is a settler-subsidized leadership that lacks any real independence necessary to confront the colonial state in a way that is effective.
What do people think? Have we come to a time where we need to begin thinking and working towards constructing an alternative to the AFN? Towards something that is directly accountable to the very people it represents, is militant in outlook and practice, and armed with a guiding ideology that can no only inspire people to political action but can actively encourage grassroots mobilization against the colonial state? |
Eyaabay Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:03:40 AM
Andrea:
On June 1, 2009 the requirements to travel across the border by car will change. In most cases, U.S, Customs and Border Protection will require a valid passport, enhanced drivers license or Nexus card in order to enter the United States. For First Nations, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has recently approved the use of the new Certificate of Indian Status the status card for this purpose. However, this new card has only begun to be issued and will not be readily available by June 1. In the interim, the U.S. will allow travel with existing status cards.
According to the Government of Canada:
The United States has indicated that the implementation of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative will be applied with a practical and common sense approach, which includes a period of flexibility. During this period of flexibility the current Certificate of Indian Status laminated paper version and pilot cards will be an acceptable document to present when visiting the United States by land and water. The Government of Canada cautions individuals that the period and extent of this flexibility is entirely at the discretion of U.S. officials...
Attached is a memo from the Dept. of Homeland Security indicating this policy change. We recommend that travellers print this document as proof of the new directive in case there are any questions or problems with U.S. Customs and Border officials.
We all need to assert our inherent rights as Anishinabeg, and our rights under the Jay''s Treaty to cross freely within our territory. We assert that this is all Anishinabeg Traditional Territory and we do not recognize the international boundary. We are strongly advising our citizens, all First Nations, that you DO assert your rights verbally and respectfully with border officials.
However, if you MUST cross the border for business or ceremonies, ensure you are prepared with the proper documentation. As this period of flexibility is at the discretion of border officials, we recommend you carry your passport if you have one, birth certificate and letter of blood quantum as a backup. We don''t want you to be turned away and refused admittance into the U.S. |
Eyaabay Thursday, June 04, 2009 8:50:40 AM
Sylvia:
I understand your frustration, we are watching the degradation of our Mother Earth happen every day. It was only last Friday that I stood with a group of Anishinabe Kwe in their protests over the development of a solid waste dump on the head waters of some of the purest ground water on earth.
I intend to initiate an environmental council or commission primarily made up of our women to provide advice on environmental issues. We don''t always need scientists or people with all kinds of academic credentials, we need people who want to provide protection to their children grandchildren. We must speak with a loud voice when we are standing up for our Mother Earth and it''s life blood.
As National Chief I can promise that I will not be silent. |
Eyaabay Thursday, June 04, 2009 8:47:34 AM
To Brock:
Your comments are well taken. You are right when you point out that there are better ways of spending the people''s money than by flying all over the country to attend a dinner or make a speech. I agree that all travel and appearences must be done strategically and with an eye to the financial implications.
I''d also have to point out that at times it is important for the National Chief to be with the people. A National Chief cannot be isolated or be with drawn from those that he or she serves. In saying that I am a firm believer in making sure all dollars are spent wisely, if travel or other dollars spent does not have a return in some way, it should not be spent. |
Eyaabay Thursday, June 04, 2009 8:46:48 AM
To Jason C:
The problem is great and there is no easy answer. We have come through over 100 years of colonial rule, years where we have been brainwashed by Indian Agents and other government officials to believe that every issue requires a battle to ensure we get benefit before the other guy takes it away. This is not to say that our chiefs have the wrong idea in mind, that is to look after their people in the best way they know how.
When we were developing the formulae for distribution of casino dollars in Ontario we spent a lot of time and had many arguments about how to do it. It is widely agreed that the system is not perfect, but it is the best that we can do, and there was consensus. That widespread consensus worked well when we negotiated the Gaming agreement with the Province to give us a share of all gaming revenue in Ontario.
There must come a time where we have to trust each other given that we share a similar history and we are presently all mired in poverty. We must overcome petty jealousies, and start thinking about the big picture. While we can blame this situation on colonialism, the solution can only be found within ourselves.
|
Andrea Monday, June 01, 2009 11:33:43 PM
I would like a fi al answer on the border crossing. Cab we
still use the old status cards, or do we need to switch over
to the new design.
Also if we do not have the new one, will accept the old
one till we recieve the new one?
I really hope I can get some clarification on this subject,
since no one has an answers.
|
brock Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:04:40 PM
i just heard this story about the nobel people were gonna throw a big shindig for mother theresa when she was given the nobel peace prize but she said fck that sht, instead of having a big party for me give that money to the poor. this made me think about the the current afn national chief who loves gala dinners and flying around the country to give speeches. I wonder how much of the people''s money is spent on airfare and $200 per plate dinners when the telephone or teleconferencing is much cheaper. I''ll ask my chief to vote beaucage, but please dont fly all the way to the rez just to say thanks or honour yourself wiht a big party. a phone call or blog post will do. |
Jason c Tuesday, May 19, 2009 11:08:31 PM
Has anyone been paying attention to the situation in manitoba? the chiefs are on the verge of destroying any semblance of unity as they fight over casinos. our people are in jail, youth are killing themselves or joining gangs, drugs alcohol violence, and the chiefs are fighting wiht each other over a casino. What can we do? democratically elected leaders who forget the people once they come into power. HOw do we fix this? Do you have any ideas on how to create unity, chief beaucage? |
Travis Boissoneau Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:37:09 AM
I had read the article about your speech at the campaign dinner in sudbury. I just wanted to add that professional designations such as Certified Management Accountants program is not offered at an accredited university, therefore, is not fundable via Post secondary funds at the community level. I am currently seeking assistance myself from my community for this program. they are working on it, however,it was made clear, that if it can not be funded via Post secondary funds which is clearly a flaw in the INAC guidelines.
I respectfully recommend professional designations such as CMACACGA etc, that are not offered an accredited university also be a focus along with the college, university and skilled trades programs, including apprenticeships that have thus far mentioned. These programs are extremely expensive and industry is barely tapped by our peoples.
thank you for listening.
Miigwetch.
Tb |
Eyaabay Tuesday, May 12, 2009 6:53:04 PM
Mark:
The youth that you heard speaking was obviously wise beyond his apprent years. He is certainly correct when stating that wealth is not just measured by the pocketbook. We are wealthy with our strong family relationships, the beautiful and abundant land that we live on and have agreed to share.
However, some of the more aesthetic displays of wealth will not pay the bills or put food on the table. Our youth need to see that if they go to Post Secondary, their labours will pay off in the long run. There has to be hope opportunity for everyone of them, that is something that is currently in short supply. Projects are being planned and worked on that will make us major players in the energy field, we are planning projects in some communities that will firmly put us on the world stage in eco-tourism ventures.
As we move away from the Indian to a true self-government model we will need a large, and competent public service that will look after the administrative requirements in governance for 1.2 million people across Canada.
It is a far ranging vision but certainly one within our grasp, one that can be accomplished within the next decade. |
Mark Jers Sunday, May 10, 2009 9:03:20 PM
I recently herd this aboriginal youth speaking. what he said was that poverty is not the effect of what is or is not in the individuals bank account, the conditions of poverty are dependent on what is in the hearts and minds of the people. He then talked about creating a real sense of empowerment for his people becuase that is the path to eliminating poverty. He didn''t try to make me feel guilty for what my ancestors did. I liked the message and I wanted to help, but he was gone before I could meet him. I was wondering if Chief Beaucage could deliver some specifics on how he would address the issue of aboriginal poverty. Thank you |
jules Saturday, May 09, 2009 7:58:33 PM
Harper''s Ec. Stimulus spending came with an ultimatum use it or lose it. While not explicitly stated, I''m sure this applies to the Indian Chiefs. I hope that whoever is the next Big Chief of all the Indians has the balls to impose accountability and transparency measures onto the reserves. Sure some are good, but too many are bad. If the Indian Chiefs squander the cash, Harper will, in the eyes of racist Canada, be given the justification he needs to take everything away and usher in a new age of assimilation. Chiefs, clean up your act or you will destroy everything you claim to be fighting for. And for God''s sake, engage your people. Traditional leaders were not the dictators of today, they ensured consensus, they ensured that everyone knew the facts and had their say. Today we are ignored for systems that strenghten a corrupt Indian elite. Perhaps J Beaucage will not be one of Her Majesty''s Indian Chiefs whose main responsibility is to ensure that Indians keep the peace and do not molest Her Majesty''s white subjects, perhaps Beaucage will be an Ogeemaw who ensures that the people know the facts and have their voices heard. And perhaps I''ll win Super 7 next Friday. |
Eyaabay Tuesday, May 05, 2009 2:54:22 PM
To Ralph at Fort Q''''Appelle:
Sorry it''''s taken a while to answer you Ralph, I''''ve been out of communication range. But your question is interesting and is essential to the question of what will happen after the Indian Act is no more.
First of all the question of authority and division of powers come from the British North America Act and within Sections 91 and 92, specifically Section 91.24 wherein it states that the Federal Government is responsible for Indians. This provides for concept of Fiduciary Duty, and eventually a few years later it was the basis of the Indian Act. My take on this is that even under Section 35 of the Constitution Act 1982 there is reluctance for the Federal Government and Provincial Governments to recognize First Nation Governments as legitimate and real, especially when it come to the sharing of power. I also have difficulty with the Federal Government being responsible for Indians and us and our governments existing on the largesse of government bureacrats. We must be seen in all respects as being equals, our governments must be as legitmate as the Federal or provincial Governments, the sharing of power and authorities as well as provisions to share in the wealth of the land through fiscal transfers and equalization payments must be a way in how we do business. No more should we take a back seat to anyone or any government, this provision for the right of self government has to be included as an amendment to the Canadian Constitution, division of powers and equalization of revenues would then be a logical extension once the Indian Act is defunct. The one issue with this is that not all First Nations are ready for this step, so there should be a phase in of the process to allow time for capacity to be built in to all First Nations. We all need to have Appeals Redress systems built in to FN consitutions along with provisions for a stable government system.
The organization of such a change will take time and effort, however, we must not forget that we now have thousands of Post-Secondary students instead of hundreds, which is what it was like not too many years ago. These are the people that will be leading the way in leadership, accounting, law, and administrative processes. These young people will want to know that there will be good paying jobs for them back at the community. We can set the table, they are going to be at the feast. |
Ralph Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:07:15 PM
We just had a discussion here that there may be voting according to the Nation demograhics: as a base, the PlainsWoodsSwampy Cree may vote for Bellegarde, the Anishnabe Saulteaux in Sask may vote in a block for Beaucage and the BC Nations may vote for Atleo. However, I understand that the successful candidate must have at least 60 of the vote. This will be a very interesting time in Calgary. Who knows where the host Blackfoot Confederacy will go, or perhaps there will be a pan-Canadian First Nations approach that will not be on tribal or nation lines. Any comments? |
Ralph, Fort Q''Appelle Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:57:45 PM
Hello, John. I don''t know you but I must say that I am impressed by what I see and hear. The question I have has to deal with power-sharing between the federal, provincial and First Nation governments when we finally get rid of the Indian Act and implement the inherent right to self-government. Such power-sharing or sharing of jurisdiction, understanding that the various governments will claim full jurisdiction in certain areas and will share jurisdiction in others, such as the SaskFSIN Gaming Agrement will require structural and orgainzational capacity of the First Nations. How do we organiza ourselves to do this? |
brock in wpg Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:11:13 PM
We should be allowed to grow Indian hemp since we are stuck with that name. Lets take it as part of our culture and a treaty right. The US and many other countries became strong on the cultivation of Indian hemp, so why not our nations. Plus, sowing Indian hemp everywhere would help to soak up excess carbon in the atmosphere, stabilize shorelines of Indian reserves that suffer erosion due to hydro electric dams. Indian hemp would also provide oils, fibers, materials for plastics, all kinds of stuff. Indian hemp is a miracle plant and the Indian nations should grow grow grow Indian hemp. Can you dig it. |
Mitchell Dokis - Nipissing FN Saturday, April 18, 2009 10:15:46 PM
Hi John,
I just want to say let''s be in the front of the Country and take control of going GREEN with Producing and Manufacturing Renewable Energy Solar Panels and Wind Power Turbins. We can be the 1st in the Country to sell and make renewable energy. We need to take charge and think about the generations to come. This is huge and we will need to make our own energy for our people across the Country. This will make jobs and money for our people. We have to think BIG and it can happen. YES WE CAN!!! |
Eyaabay Friday, April 17, 2009 9:53:00 AM
To Joey W.
The Union of Ontario Indians is an old organization. Their name was coined in 1959. However, that refers to only the corporate entity. Our collective of First Nations and our citizens are known as the Anishinabek Nation. We are indeed Anishinaabe, through and through.
Although we have become educated in the non-native world, and aspire for higher office, doesn''t necessarily mean we are Indians. I have often spoken publicly against these terms and have led a movement to eliminate the term aboriginal from our vocabulary. Our citizenship initiative is a total movement away from Section 6 and the definition of Status Indian to defining our own laws respecting Anishinabek citizens. Citizenship, identity and pride are key component to my national platform.
However, we should not be so quick to fault those who may identify themselves as Indians. We have to remember, First Nations people have had generation after generation of systemic assimilation and mind-altering conditioning to take our culture, language and identity away from us. It is safe to say it will take generations after generation to restore this. My role, as leader, will be to foster, advocate and encourage all aspects of nationhood including the restoration of our respective indigenous identities from coast-to-coast-to-coast.
Miigwetch for your comments. |
Joey W. Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:47:01 PM
Still no comment on the identity question, eh? Like I said, the people who vote for you are Indians first, and they revert to their true ancestral identities second. So even though the Union of Ontario Indians says they aren''t Indians, for you to come right out and say I''m not an Indian, I''m Anishinabe will surely cost you the vote. I forgive you for not taking a definitive stand, not that my opinion matters to the chiefs. |
Joey W. Wednesday, April 01, 2009 4:41:50 PM
...We are not Indians, natives, or aboriginal. We are, always have been and always will be Anishinabek.- from union of Ontario Indians website.
Mr. Beaucage, are you an Indian? I realize that this is a difficult question to answer because all of the people who will be voting for you are Indians first and Anishinabe second or Athabaska, Siksika, Dene, etc..., but a growing number of youth, especially in Northern Manitoba think that that designation is stupid imagine that, Indians who think that they aren''t Indians. What will these crazy 7th Generation youth think of next? |
Lorne Tuesday, March 31, 2009 5:43:23 PM
I have read in no place just how this hst will effect us natives,will we be pst exempt or hst exempt and will I be able to use my status card when purchasing a fridgestove etc. |
Tracey Friday, March 27, 2009 10:27:04 AM
Two issues I find the most repulsive with the Ontario Budget are: the harmonized taxation and the reduced personal income tax. During an economic crises, many of the ''''''''Working Poor like single parent family income earners and low income families in general, will have more significant hardships. Does this mean the conservative gov''''t will have post-secondary education band funding on the next hit list? |
R. Land Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:28:16 PM
It is encouraging to see a leader who exemplifies the traits of the Chiefs from an earlier era. I will look forward to reading John''s statement concerning the Ontario budget. |
Bob Goulais Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:08:10 PM
R. Land: John will be releasing a statement following the Budget Speech tomorrow afternoon. I trust that this will answer your questions. I will post it on his Blog as well. Miigwetch for your views. |
R. Land Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:03:16 PM
The Ontario Government may be blending the PST and GST. How will this affect our rights not to pay Taxes on goods we buy off the reserve? The AFN was slow to campaign against the GST and as a result individual status people must pay GST. I consider this a violation of our treaty right to be tax exempt. The grass roots population will be heavily affected by a blended PSTGST. I think we need a Grand Chief who advocates for our constitutional and treaty rights, but who also understands the issues that affect the majority of the people. This new tax will leave less money for people to spend on basic needs. |
Jason Brunette Friday, March 20, 2009 1:28:55 PM
Are FN''''s ready for larger-than-life economic disasters that will affect the flow of money to communities?
for example, the depression way-back in the 30''''s forced the Gov''''t to shut down social assistance programs, public transit, and all other frills, as they retreated into crisis mode to merely save the country''''s basic services.
Today, the same economic disaster would translate into FN communities closing down until cash flows again to be able to provide services. Communities would have to ''''double-up'''' and amalgamate to provide food rations and healthcare.
Dancing with dependency is lovely until your dance partner says they want to sit down for a while. then what?
|
eli Monday, March 09, 2009 9:31:33 PM
Thanks. Sorry for being so impatient. You realize of course that too many of our people have been in crisis mode for decades. |
Bob Goulais Monday, March 09, 2009 7:15:54 PM
My apologies, Eli. It''s been a busy time, but John is sitting down and doing some responses as we speak. Tony, check out the Blog site, he has posted his response to you there. |
eli Monday, March 09, 2009 6:55:59 PM
Hey there Tony. You''ve asked some difficult questions there. Don''t expect an answer. I''ve been waiting for nearly a week for a simple query. The people need to form strong united fronts against all established forms of authority, including the chiefs. They don''t listen to us unless we say exactly what they want us to say. |
Tony Monday, March 09, 2009 1:23:36 AM
I''''''''m a Sask FN citizen and am not supportive of Perry Bellegarde because I don''''''''t think he has the experience or pizazz of either John or Shawn. I need to know John''''''''s position on the implemtation of Treaty 6 and all the other numbered Treaties and how the inherent right ot self-governemnt impacts on this implemtnation process. There are some of us in Treaty 6 that believe that we will not be able to implement Treaty untill we implement the inherent right to self-government. What say you? And don''''''''t let Bob Goulais answer on your behalf. |
eli Friday, March 06, 2009 4:19:31 PM
Hi. How does the comments section on the blogcast work. I thought my comment would show up on the site. Will I eventually recieve an email response to my comment. One of my hopes is that we have leaders who, or their staff, actually respond to the people. I hope Chief Beaucage will be one of those leaders. Thanks |
Payzhannakut Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:23:25 PM
Since youth are important to Mr. Beaucage, I hope he will take the time to visit universities with large Aboriginal student populations. I like the idea of nationhood, but his version seems like a watered-down version of another group''s ? idea of nationhood. Maybe its just me, I''m a separatist. Let Canada have a piece of the continent, and let Anishinabe have their own piece to do with as they please. Total independence. Good luck on getting the votes of the chiefs in your quest to give the people the right to vote, you will need it. |
karen Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:58:56 PM
When the subject of capcity building comes up I immediately go to my concept of Native Literacy which is to find a way to help individuals understand their original values as identity buiding; the influence of their history in regards to false consciousness of helplessness; stereotyping that holds them down; and relevant curriculum that inspires them to go on. In Ontario Native Literacy we have tried to get acknowledgement and recognition from AFN for the job we do in terms of undoing the impact of residential school and current education curriculum. No luck so far. John, take on the support and patronage of Native Literacy and you have the votes of thousands who have been cast aside by school, politics and poverty. |
Tracey King, Wasauksing FN band member Monday, March 02, 2009 3:31:45 PM
I strongly agree that theAFN National Chief Election should involve all of its people as voting members, not only the Chiefs. Traditionally, our Leaders put our People first before themselves. As well, many members are moving off-reserve trying to create a better life for their families education, employment, and they should not be forgotten.The growing rate of single parent families are on a rise and hopefully you won''t forget us, too. My family and friends from the Rez are rooting for you.
All the Best, Tracey King B.A., B.Ed., M.Ed. Candidate
|
Arnya Assance Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:13:16 PM
I fully support, and am reaching within my circle of friends and beyond, for our members to encourage each prospective chief to vote for fundamental change - John Beaucage for AFN National Chief.
Your platform is here and now, and forward thinking! Your usage of different mediums - is inspirational :
To coin another agent for change - YES WE CAN! |
Joseph Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:51:12 PM
If he gets in at AFN, what becomes of AN? I am a layman citizen. I just don''t want to see him led into the void, to see him take the flight of Icarus. Now, having children of my own, I am concerned about the effects mob-rule has on our development. I see in him a ''strong horse'', personally I want him to ourselves.
I am hard-line Anishnabe. I''m not Blackfoot, Mohawk or MicMaq and I don''t want to share. We need our strength here at home.
To us and ours.
....We are coming out of the woodwork now. Hate to see you leave us with some tenderfoot.
Sir, who''s in line? |
Bob Goulais Thursday, February 05, 2009 6:59:29 PM
Thanks for the comment, Angus. The first ballot will take place on the morning of July 22, 2009 at the Calgary Convention Centre, Calgary, AB.
Don''t forget to join the Facebook group: John Beaucage for National Chief. |
Angus Woodford Wednesday, February 04, 2009 10:25:34 PM
I like what I hear..inclusion for grassroots people is a must for a true democracy...we must do away with the boys club too much is at stake to let a bunch of boys get their hands on our people''s destiny.
Where will the AFN conference take place this year? |
| |
